Legal Opinion

Jolicoeur v. Colonial Penn Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 16, 1981No. 80-395PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This appeal arises out of a petition for declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) in which the plaintiff sought a determination of the extent of her coverage under the medical expenses provisions of an automobile insurance policy issued to her by the defendant. The Superior Court (Contas, J.) gave effect to an exclusion in the policy relating to payments for medical expenses made under the federal Medicare program. We affirm.

On or about February 1, 1979, the plaintiff was driving her automobile with her two sisters as passengers when she was involved in an automobile accident that resulted in severe…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robbins Auto Parts, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Charest v. Union Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
  3. Beliveau v. Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  4. Peerless Insurance v. VigueSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  5. Bertolami v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fadden v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API