Fadden v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
BATCHELDER, J.
The plaintiff, Melody Fadden, appeals the ruling of the Superior Court {Hollman, J.) that the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan), is not obligated to pay her medical expenses under a motor vehicle liability policy. She argues that the trial court erred in ruling: (1) that workers’ compensation benefits were “equivalent medical coverage” under RSA 264:16, 11(b) (1993); and (2) that Jolicoeur v. Colonial Penn Insurance Company, 121 N.H. 793, 435 A.2d 514 (1981), is controlling. We affirm.
The plaintiff was injured while…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Jolicoeur v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gorman v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999