Legal Opinion

Fadden v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 14, 1994No. 93-402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

BATCHELDER, J.

The plaintiff, Melody Fadden, appeals the ruling of the Superior Court {Hollman, J.) that the defendant, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan), is not obligated to pay her medical expenses under a motor vehicle liability policy. She argues that the trial court erred in ruling: (1) that workers’ compensation benefits were “equivalent medical coverage” under RSA 264:16, 11(b) (1993); and (2) that Jolicoeur v. Colonial Penn Insurance Company, 121 N.H. 793, 435 A.2d 514 (1981), is controlling. We affirm.

The plaintiff was injured while…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Jolicoeur v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gorman v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API