Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided September 1, 2009No. 1860084PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*733HALEY, Judge.
James Carroll (“Carroll”) argues that 1) the trial court erred in finding that he violated the conditions of his probation by refusing to admit that he committed the crime charged during court-ordered sex offender treatment because he had entered his guilty plea while asserting his innocence pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); and 2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his request for individual therapy in lieu of the court-ordered sex offender treatment program. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Havens v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Carroll v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- State of Tennessee v. Westley A. AlbrightTennessee Supreme Court · 2018
- Carroll v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Hamlet v. IrvinDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.