Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided September 1, 2009No. 1860084Published
1Opinion of the Court
682 S.E.2d 92 (2009)
54 Va. App. 730
James CARROLL
v.
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia.
Record No. 1860-08-4.
Court of Appeals of Virginia, Alexandria.
September 1, 2009.
Clarence F. Stanback, Jr., for appellant.
Richard B. Smith, Special Assistant Attorney General (William C. Mims, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.
Present: HUMPHREYS, HALEY and ALSTON, JJ.
HALEY, Judge.
James Carroll ("Carroll") argues that 1) the trial court erred in finding that he violated the conditions of his probation by refusing to admit that he committed the crime charged during court-ordered sex offender treatment because he…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.