Mathews v. Savings Union Bank & Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. P. Shortall, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.
This appeal concerns the construction of sections 1269a and 1273 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and section 15 of the Bank Act, as they were amended in 1915. They relate to escheats of unclaimed bank deposits. The facts are admitted.
In 1868, William Anderson deposited with the Savings Loan Society Bank of San Francisco, the predecessor of the defendant, one thousand five hundred dollars, which with the accumulations of interest grew to $12,525.12 by the 1st of January, 1917. Anderson died at his residence in Lake County in August, 1892. Under the provisions of section 15 of the Bank Act the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- In re MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hospital Council of Northern California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- State v. Savings Union Bank Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Anderson v. FergusonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Shannon, Auditor v. HeringerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.