Legal Opinion

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 23, 1997No. 76,357PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

This action was initiated by the issuer of a homeowner’s insurance policy. The question litigated was whether the incident in question involving an automobile was covered by the homeowner’s insurance policy. The trial court held there was no coverage under the homeowner’s insurance policy. The defendants appeal.

It is not only politics that make strange bedfellows; sometimes lawsuits have the same effect. The three parties suing each other in the underlying damage action are joined together as appellants on this appeal. For that reason, we begin by identifying the parties involved.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Upland Mutual Insurance, Inc. v. NoelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. Shinabarger v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Cameron Mutual Insurance Co. v. WardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Crist v. Hunan Palace, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  3. Federal Insurance Company, & v. Tri-State Insurance Company, & Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  4. Colfax Ex Rel. Colfax v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  5. Kincaid v. SturdevantDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API