Legal Opinion

Federal Insurance Company, & v. Tri-State Insurance Company, & Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 15, 1998No. 96-5206, 96-5271PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) settled a claim against its insured for $2.75 million. Federal’s insured was also listed as an additional insured under policies issued by Tri-State Insurance Company (“Tri-State”). Federal sued Tri-State for indemnification of the $2.75 million. The district court held that Tri-State owed Federal $2 million under two of Tri-State’s policies, but that two other Tri-State policies were inapplicable and that Federal could not recover prejudgment interest. Tri-State appeals and Federal cross-appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

B…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. American States Ins. Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  3. American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  4. Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Rivera v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  3. Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  4. Corder v. Lewis Palmer School District No. 38Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  5. Smart v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API