Federal Insurance Company, & v. Tri-State Insurance Company, & Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) settled a claim against its insured for $2.75 million. Federal’s insured was also listed as an additional insured under policies issued by Tri-State Insurance Company (“Tri-State”). Federal sued Tri-State for indemnification of the $2.75 million. The district court held that Tri-State owed Federal $2 million under two of Tri-State’s policies, but that two other Tri-State policies were inapplicable and that Federal could not recover prejudgment interest. Tri-State appeals and Federal cross-appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
B…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- American States Ins. Co. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- American Motorists Insurance v. L-C-A Sales Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Meadowbrook, Inc. v. Tower Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- American Management Systems, Inc. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Taurus Holdings v. US FidelitySupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Rivera v. City & County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Corder v. Lewis Palmer School District No. 38Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Smart v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.