Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstrong

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 1, 2000No. 99-0256/ARPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge GIERKE

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of 6 specifications of committing indecent acts with his daughter, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The court-martial sentenced appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence but suspended confinement in excess of 2 years for 2 years.

In an unpublished opinion, the Court of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  4. United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  5. United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  2. United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. BaumannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. MoolickCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. United States v. BentonArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API