Legal Opinion

Union Pacific Railroad v. Hadley

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 18, 1918No. 174PublishedCited by 96 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is an action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act of April 22, 1908, c. 140, 35 Stat. 65, for causing the death of Cradit, the plaintiff’s (the defendant in error’s) intestate. The casé was brought to this Court before the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726, and with the exception of one or two matters that need a word, presents only the ordinary questions of negligence that it is not our practice to discuss at length.

The deceased was a brakeman on an eastbound freight train known as Extra 504 East. At Dix, in Nebraska, it was overtaken by another eastbound train known…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. WilesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Fairmount Glass Works v. Cub Fork Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. James P. Merchant v. Philip Henry RuhleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  5. Jehl v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1967

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API