Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 7, 1960No. Reap. Dec. 9656; Entry Nos. A-4033; A-4058; A-3770; A-3960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Four appeals to reappraisement have been consolidated for purposes of trial. The merchandise consists of steam traps, which were exported from Canada. Plaintiff abandoned its appeals as to all the imported steam traps except only those that were enumerated by statement in open court. Such steam traps are identified in the invoices (which are of record) either by the letter “S” or the letter “P.” These steam traps, as to which the appeals are now prosecuted, are the invoice items that are set forth in the annexed schedule A, which is made a part of this decision and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Holt v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  3. United States v. Schroeder & Tremayne, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1961
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  3. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Stockheimer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Arditi v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API