Legal Opinion

A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 12, 1963No. Reap. Dec. 10634; Entry No. F-3042, etcPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

At a term of court field at Eouses Point, N.Y., plaintiff moved to consolidate for purposes of trial an aggregate of *4761,392 appeals from appraisements at several ports along the Canadian border, as follows:

Champlain, N.Y_ 110 appeals Rouses Point, N.Y- 1,249 appeals

Highgate Springs, Vt_ 7 appeals St. Albans, Yt- 23 appeals

Malone, N.Y_ 2 appeals Alexandria Bay, N.Y— 1 appeal

The appeals were consolidated. A schedule, marked schedule A, identifying by reappraisement appeal number, name of plaintiff, and port of entry, each of these 1,392 consolidated appeals, is annexed hereto and is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1961
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Raylite Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Montgomery Ward v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Ercona Camera Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Tapetes Luxor, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Yamaha International Industries U.S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API