Holt v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Cole, Judge:
We are required in this proceeding to review the -decision of Cline, J., 20 Cust. Ct. 367, Reap. Dec. 7523, holding foreign value, section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), to be the proper basis for reappraisement of merchandise imported from Cuba, and such statutory value to be the appraised value.
Appellant, plaintiff below, has assigned 14 errors. Our conclusion disposes of all but we deem it unnecessary to discuss each separately.
The articles in question are so-called “special” type brooms, which…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. RichardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. WeckerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Scharf Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- Pleissner v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- International Commercial Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
- A. N. Deringer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Intra-Mar Transport Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
- Vance Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969