Legal Opinion
Whitman v. State Highway Commission of Missouri
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided May 6, 1975No. 1793PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS AND OPINION
ELMO B. HUNTER, District Judge.
This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief arising out of a highway relocation and improvement project on U. S. Highway 54, a federal-aid primary highway, in Miller County, Missouri. Plaintiffs at all times relevant to this litigation were husband and wife, and were doing business as Osage Outdoor Advertising. Defendant State Highway Commission of Missouri (the Commission) is an entity created under the Constitution and Laws of the State of Missouri, and is authorized to sue and be sued in its own name. § 226.100 RSMo. (1969).…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Roosevelt Lathan and Pearline Lathan, His Wife v. John A. Volpe, as Secretary of the United States Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- National Advertising Co. v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States v. 40.00 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Henry CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1976
- Beaird-Poulan Division of Emerson Electric Co. v. Department of HighwaysDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.