Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Heaton

California Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1902No. S.F. No. 2680PublishedCited by 22 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This appeal arises out of a contest for letters of administration. Letters were awarded to respondent, Jennie M. Heaton, upon the ground that she was the daughter of deceased, the court holding that she was the illegitimate daughter of deceased, Warren D. Heaton, legitimated under the provisions of section 230 of the Civil Code. That section reads: “The father of an illegitimate-child, by publicly acknowledging it as his own, receiving it as such, with the consent of his wife, if h§ is married, into his family, and otherwise treating it as if it were a legitimate child, thereby adopts it as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pearson v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. In re Estate of PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Welch v. All PersonsMontana Supreme Court · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API