Nixon v. Nixon
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
It is hornbook law that when a motion for judgment of nonsuit is made, the plaintiff is entitled to have his evidence considered in the light most favorable to him, and he i-s entitled to the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. Bridges v. Graham, 246 N.C. 371, 98 S.E. 2d 492. “Discrepancies and contradictions, even in plaintiff’s evidence, are for the twelve and not for the court,” Barlow v. Bus Lines, 229 N.C. 382, 49 S.E. 2d 793, and do not justify a nonsuit. Keaton v. Taxi Co., 241 N.C. 589, 86 S.E. 2d 93.
Considering plaintiffs’ evidence according to the rule, it…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Furst v. . MerrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Griffin v. Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
- Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Barlow v. City Bus Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Barbee v. . BarbeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- King Homes, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Clarke v. HolmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- United States v. Real Property Located at 5201 Woodlake DriveDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1995
- Wescott v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.