Legal Opinion

Sutter v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1975No. 166 (1974)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The plaintiffs contend that the trial court either erred in failing to exercise its discretion to grant relief from judgment or abused its discretion in its exercise; and ask this court to reverse the orders of the trial court in the interest of justice.

The trial court was without power to grant the relief requested. After providing in a general way for the mandate of this court, sec. 274.35, Stats., declares:

“. . . In all cases the supreme court shall remit its judgment or decision to the court below and thereupon the court below shall proceed in accordance therewith.”

It is desirable that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. John Mohr & Sons, Inc. v. JahnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Patten Paper Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SarinskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Mullen v. CoolongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  5. Elizabeth Bothfeld v. Wisconsin Elections CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API