Legal Opinion

In re: IntraMTA Switched Acces

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 27, 2020No. 18-10768PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Case: 18-10768 Document: 00515430892 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/27/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 18-10768 May 27, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk IN RE: INTRAMTA SWITCHED ACCESS CHARGES LITIGATION consolidated with Nos. 18-10770, 18-10772, 18-10774, 18-10776, 18-10778, 18-10779, 18-10781, 18-10787, 18-10788, 18-10790, 18-10791, 18-10792, 18-10794, 18-10796, 18-10797, 18-10798, 18-10799, 18-10800, 18-10802, 18-10803, 18-10804, 18-10805, 18-10806, 18-10808, 18-10810, 18-10812, 18-10813, 18-10814, 18-10815, 18-10816,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. At&T Corp. v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Green Valley Special Util Dist v. Donna Nelson, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API