Legal Opinion
Semet-Solway Co. v. Wilcox
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 14, 1906No. 54PublishedCited by 6 opinions
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
In this opinion the parties will be designated in conformity with their respective positions in the court below, *840where the defendant in error was plaintiff and the plaintiff in error was defendant. By a contract in writing, dated May 13, 1903, the defendant employed the plaintiff for the term of five years; and in the statement of his cause of action the latter alleged that:
“On or about the 1st day of November, 1904, the defendant, without cause or reason, or previous notice to the plaintiff, advised the plaintiff that it refused to recognize any obligation under said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Pierce v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Phoenix Ins. Co. v. DosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Schuchardt v. AllensSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- The People v. . EastwoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Houger v. HougerAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Wright v. BarnardDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1917
- Russell v. Barnes FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wright v. BarnardDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1919
- Russell v. Barnes FoundationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.