Mohr v. Byrne
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison,j.
—Motion to dismiss the appeal of the intervener for failure to serve all of the adverse parties.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant Kate C. Byrne the amount due upon certain promissory notes executed by her, and that the defendant Florence Blythe Hinckley be directed to pay the said judgment out of certain moneys owing by her to said Byrne. Issues were joined upon this complaint by the defendants Hinckley and Byrne, and a complaint in intervention was filed by the appellant, Kowalsky. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Hinckley…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Mohr v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mannix v. TryonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Mohr v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sherman v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
- Salas v. DoeSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
- Salas v. DoeSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953