Mohr v. Byrne
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Motion to dismiss the appeal. This action was brought to recover the amount of certain promissory notes executed by the respondent Kate C. Byrne, and held by the plaintiff. A complaint in intervention was filed by Henry I. Kowalsky, in which he claimed an interest in one of said notes. Judgment was rendered in the action in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendants, and that the intervenor, Kowalsky, "take nothing by this action.” From this judgment the intervenor has taken an appeal. A motion is now made in behalf of the defendants Kate C. Byrne and John E. Byrne to dismiss the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dalzell v. Superior Court of San Benito CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Doll v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Gallardo v. Atl. & Pac. Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Advertising Co. v. City of Rohnert ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mohr v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Peter v. KalezIdaho Supreme Court · 1905