Vansant v. Commonwealth

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clarke —

Affirming.

Appellant was convicted of operating an illicit still, and seeks a reversal of the judgment upon the grounds that the evidence for the Commonwealth was incompetent and that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence.

A sufficient answer to the first complaint is, that the defendant neither objected nor excepted to the introduction of any of the Commonwealth’s testimony.

Nor is there any merit in appellant’s other contention, since it was proven by the witnesses for the Commonwealth that a path led from defendant’s residence to a still located…