McCall v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
.Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Sandidge
Reversing.
Appellant, Jim McCall, prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the Letcher circuit court imposing upon him a fine of $100.00 and imprisonment for sixty days as a penalty for manufacturing whiskey. It is insisted for him that the verdict of guilty is flagrantly against the evidence.
The Commonwealth introduced the' following proof as tending to establish appellant’s guilt: Two witnesses discovered a still set up and ready for operation and near it about two hundred gallons of mash. One of the witnesses testified that the still was located…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McKinney v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Vansant v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- West v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Cornett v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
- Casey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Sayler v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Noah v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Shelton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950