Legal Opinion

Kaiser v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 3, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

Appellant was convicted of the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and the principal ground urged *101for a reversal is that all the evidence was obtained by an illegal search. In reply it is sufficient to say that the evidence was heard without objection, or motion to exclude, and, that being true, the error, if any, is not available on -appeal. Mullins v. Commonwealth, 204 Ky. 445, 264 S. W. 1048; Vansant v. Commonwealth, 204 Ky. 489, 264 S. W. 1074.

Another contention is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction. The officers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mullins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Vansant v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Albritton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Bartholomew v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API