McKinney v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Clarke
Affirming.
Appellant was convicted of having an illicit still in his possession, and the only grounds urged for the reversal of the judgment are, that the court erred in refusing to direct an acquittal, and that the verdict is flagrantly against the evidence.
Six or seven barrels, a keg and a gasoline tank were found upon the defendant’s land, and about 150 yards from his house. Two or three of the barrels had beer mash in them, and a path led down the hill in the direction of defendant’s house as far as the L. & N. railroad tracks, which separated the house…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Mobley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
- Cotton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
- Slaton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Vansant v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perry's Adm'x v. Inter-Southern L. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- McCall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
- Wilder's Administrator v. Southern Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Newman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925