Kerford Limestone Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets KERFORD LIMESTONE CO. v. NEBRASKA DEPT. OF REV. 653 Cite as
287 Neb. 653
CONCLUSION The State presented sufficient evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt Samantha’s status as being habitually truant under § 43-247(3)(b). We reject her argument that the State was first required to show that her school provided the services contemplated by § 79-209(2), and we hold that § 79-209 does not impose any preconditions upon the juvenile court’s exclu- sive and original jurisdiction under § 43-247(3)(b). The judg- ment of the juvenile court is affirmed. Affirmed. Heavican,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holdsworth v. Greenwood Famers Co-opNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Invol. Dissolution of Wiles Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- Lozier Corp. v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Wagner v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- J.P. v. Millard Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cain v. Custer Cty. Bd. of Equal.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Ash Grove Cement Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- SID No. 1 v. AdamyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Barrios v. Comm'r of Labor of the Neb. Dep't of LaborNebraska Court of Appeals · 2018
- Cookson v. RamgeNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.