J.P. v. Millard Public Schools

Nebraska Advance Sheets 890 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS Love Signs had a duty to discover any latent defect in the sign that could cause the sign to collapse. The district court concluded that Love Signs clearly had no duty to inspect, maintain, or care for the sign and pole on Wilkinson’s premises. It concluded that Love Signs’ obliga- tions were to service the sign and replace lamps and ballasts within the sign. It sustained Love Signs’ motion for sum- mary judgment. The district court did not err in sustaining the motion. CONCLUSION Durre’s claims against Tri-City are time barred by the statute…