Legal Opinion
Lozier Corp. v. Douglas Cty. Bd. of Equal.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2013No. S-12-322, S-12-323, S-12-324PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets LOZIER CORP. v. DOUGLAS CTY. BD. OF EQUAL. 705 Cite as
285 Neb. 705
raised by the facts, but not presented in the pleadings, should not come at the expense of due process.” 273 Neb. at 1053, 736 N.W.2d at 373. In the present case, the amended complaint filed by Matt sought to modify custody and to award full custody to him. Although Brittni and Cristian expressed a preference during the custody hearing for a schedule in which they would stay with their parents by alternating 1 week at a time, no com- plaint to modify the parenting plan to this or other effect was filed.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Abrams v. Ohio Pacific ExpressSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. StrussNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Creighton St. Joseph Regional Hospital v. Nebraska Tax Equalization & Review CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. Mitzi M.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Watkins v. WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
- In re App. No. C-4973 of SkrdlantNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- Kerford Limestone Co. v. Nebraska Dept. of Rev.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Rodehorst Bros. v. City of Norfolk Bd. of AdjustmentNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SchanamanNebraska Supreme Court · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.