Legal Opinion
UNITED ALLOYS, INC. v. Baker
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 22, 2011No. CV 93-4722 CBM (Ex)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
The matter before the Court, the Honorable Consuelo B. Marshall, United States District Judge presiding, is the bench trial held on Plaintiff and Counter-defendant United Alloys, Ine.’s (“United Alloys”) claims for cost recovery and declaratory relief against Defendant and Counter-claimant Flask Chemical Corporation (“Flask”), and Flask’s counterclaims for contribution against United Alloys, due to the contamination at United Alloys’ property located at 900 East Slauson Avenue in Los Angeles, California. Upon…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Atlantic Research Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Chem-Dyne Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Wickland Oil Terminals, a California Corporation v. Asarco, Inc., a New Jersey Corporation, and State Lands Commission of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Arnold Eng'g Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.