Legal Opinion
Sweeney v. Smith
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided February 5, 1909No. 173PublishedCited by 15 opinions
In Equity. On demurrers to bill.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The defendants in this action may be arranged in two groups, one composed of the partners in the firm of Edward B. Smith & Co., and the other composed oí John W. Van Dyke and B'rank D. Zell. The bill does not pray for the same, or even similar, relief against each group, but asks for different, and, indeed, for only distantly related, decrees, as will be seen in a few moments. It is not altogether easy to summarize the charges of the bill, for the complainant has chosen the unusual and undesirable course of including much of his evidence and not a few…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Boyson v. ThornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Glencoe Land & Gravel Co. v. Hudson Bros. Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Thacker Coal Co. v. BurkeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
- Passaic Print Works v. Ely & Walker Dry-Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
3Cited by15 opinions
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
- Snowden v. SorensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Continental Research, Inc. v. Cruttenden, Podesta & MillerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1963
- Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. RadkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.