Continental Research, Inc. v. Cruttenden, Podesta & Miller
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Continental Research, Inc., is a Minnesota corporation with its home office in Golden Valley, Minnesota. The defendant Cruttenden, Podesta & Miller, a securities dealer and broker,, was at the times relevant herein a partnership with its home office in Chicago, Illinois.
This is an action in tort for interference with or inducing the breach of a contract between the plaintiff and .Harold E. Wood & Company, a Minnesota corporation, with its home office in St. Paul, Minnesota. The legal issues involve the interaction of three sets of events: (1) dealings…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Vegelahn v. GuntnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- William Dougherty v. Parsec, Inc. Truck Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers, Local Union 100 Budco Group, Inc., Seaboard System RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Stephenson v. Plastics Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Smith v. American Guild of Variety ArtistsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Central Specialties, Inc. v. Jonathan LargeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.