Legal Opinion

Snowden v. Sorensen

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1956No. 36,668, 36,669PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Action by R. B. Snowden against defendant Frank L. Sorensen, doing business as Solar Products Company, Ltd., a trade name, for breach of a contract; and against defendants John L. Lenihan and Pharmakon, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, for inducing defendant Sorensen to bring about such breach in making impossible his performance of such contract.

At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the motions of defendants Lenihan and Pharmakon, Inc., for directed verdicts were denied; and thereupon all defendants rested. The trial court then directed verdicts in favor of plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Sorenson v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Johnson v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Sweeney v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909
  5. Minnesota Wheat Growers Co-Operative Marketing Ass'n v. RadkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. United Wild Rice, Inc. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Wolf v. PerryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1959
  4. American Surety Company, a Corporation, and Frank W. Rohlik v. Frank SchottenbauerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
  5. National Recruiters, Inc. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API