Zobrist v. Sheriff
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
Zobrist, Kratter and Oram filed with this court a petition for a writ of habeas corpus which we made returnable before the *626First Judicial District Court. Such-procedure is authorized by Constitution and statute. Nev. Const., art. 6, sec. 4; NRS 34.380(2).
It now is settled that factual determinations by a district court in a pretrial habeas proceeding commenced in that court arising, out of a criminal charge and resulting in the denial of relief, are not the subject of appellate review. 1979 Nev. Stats., ch. 216; NRS 34.380; Gary v. Sheriff, 96 Nev. 78, 605…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of ZanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Matter of Application of ShoemakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Application of LaioloNevada Supreme Court · 1967
- Ex Parte PhilipieNevada Supreme Court · 1966
- Gary v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ryan's Express Transportation Services, Inc. v. Amador Stage Lines, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Zugel Ex Rel. Zugel v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- In re EasthamNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Braunstein (Steve) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
- Braunstein (Steve) v. Dist. Ct. (State)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.