Matter of Application of Shoemaker
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The petitioner is held in custody and restrained of his liberty, at the city of Sacramento, by one Charles TI. Harrington, agent of the state of Illinois, under the alleged authority of an executive warrant issued by the governor of the state of California on a requisition from the governor of said state of Illinois, authorizing the removal of the petitioner to the latter state to answer to an alleged indictment purporting to charge him with the crimes of conspiracy, larceny, and receiving stolen goods, alleged to have been committed in the city of Chicago, said state of Illinois, on the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Ex Parte ReggelSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Illinois Ex Rel. McNichols v. PeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- People Ex Rel. Lawrence v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. BoothMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- In Re HarperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- State v. PhillipsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.