Legal Opinion

Application of Laiolo

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1967No. 5209, 5210PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

These are consolidated original proceedings for writs of habeas corpus. Each petitioner is a President of a State Bank, and each challenges the legality of his arrest and restraint for the failure of his bank to pay a Reno City business license fee. In each instance the challenge rests mainly upon the ground that the ordinance as written is unconstitutional as applied to banks since its language is so vague and indefinite as to violate due process. Habeas is an appropriate remedy to resolve this question. NRS 34.500(4) [authorizing discharge from restraint…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Williams v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  3. Ex parte SMITHNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Smith v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ex Parte PhilipieNevada Supreme Court · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. GlusmanNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  2. City of Las Vegas v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Anderson v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sheriff, Clark County v. LuqmanNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Dunphy v. SheehanNevada Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API