Legal Opinion
Williams v. Johanns
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 2, 2008No. Civil Action 03-2245 (CKK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
The instant Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order concern the civil con tempt of Mr. James W. Myart, Jr., counsel for Plaintiffs in the above-captioned proceeding. Magistrate Judge John M. Fac-ciola issued the following Order in this case on July 21, 2005:
All settlement discussions held before the Magistrate Judge are confidential. It is therefore, hereby, ORDERED that any participant who discloses what occurred during those discussions will be held in contempt of court and may be punished by a fíne or imprisonment or both. It is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hildebrandt v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Williams v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Griego v. DouglasDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.