Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 1, 2009No. Civil Action 03-2245 (CKK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Robert and LaVerne Williams allege that they were discriminated against on the basis of race by the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) when their application for a farm loan was denied in 2003. Defendant Ed Schafer, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (together with the United States and other government officials sued in their official capacities, “Defendants”), deny Plaintiffs’ allegations and have filed the pending [223] Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 After a searching review of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moses v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Haug v. PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Martin Jackson v. International Fiber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. Bradshaw v. JohannsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  5. Presidential Bank, Fsb v. 1733 27th Street Se LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API