Legal Opinion
State v. Braman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 27, 1983No. 10040PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The defendant, Lloyd Bra-man, was convicted by a jury of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), which crime occurred on March 4, 1979, at the Brass Hammer Cafe in Manchester. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in admitting evidence concerning (1) a prior uncharged act of robbery and (2) the conduct and state of mind of the defendant’s girl friend subsequent to the robbery of which he was found guilty. We find no error.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The Brass Hammer Cafe in Manchester was a small…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. FalbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Casalo v. ClaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- State v. SharpeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. MooneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.