Legal Opinion

Pan Coal Co. v. Garland Pocahontas Coal Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1924PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEREDITH, PRESIDENT :

Defendant complains of a judgment rendered in an action for trespass upon plaintiff’s coal lands.

Plaintiff sued to recover (1) the value of coal wilfully mined and removed from its premises, and (2) damages for injury done to its unmined coal. Counsel for defendant urge that the declaration is subject to demurrer, because they say in effect that plaintiff’s case is based on two theories, — first, that it seeks recovery of the valne of the coal mined, without deduction of the expense of mining, and second, it seeks to recover damages done to the freehold. They argue that…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Clarke v. Ohio River R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Wilson v. Phoenix Powder Manf'g Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pentress Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. State v. CountsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Swiss Oil Corporation v. HuppCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  2. Jeffery Moore v. Equitrans, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
  3. O'Neal v. Peake Operating Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Shonk Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Reynolds v. Pardee & Curtin Lumber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API