Legal Opinion

Rensselaer Valve Co. v. National Bank of Commerce of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1924No. 17642PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

The appellant, Rensselaer Yalve Company, is a corporation engaged in the manufacture of valves and hydrants, having its factory and its principal place of business at Troy, in the state of New York. It maintains a branch place of business in the city of Seattle for the sale of its products. This branch, during the times which gave rise to the present controversy, was under the management of one Fred H. Hayner, who conducted it under the title of “Rens-selaer Yalve Company. Fred H. Hayner, Mgr.” The appellant’s trade in Seattle was principally with contractors on public works, who paid for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  2. Allen v. Puritan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Adoue & LobitTexas Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Wagner Trading Co. v. Battery Park National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  5. Commercial & Agricultural Bank v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1857

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Smith v. Olympic BankWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Jett v. Lewis State BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Peterson v. Pacific First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. Johnson v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API