Legal Opinion

Smith v. Olympic Bank

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1985No. 50511-0PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

We hold that, where a bank allows a check that is made payable to a guardian to be deposited in a guardian's personal account instead of a guardianship account, the bank is not a holder in due course under the Uniform Commercial Code because it has notice that the guardian is breaching his fiduciary duty.

Facts

Charles Alcombrack was appointed guardian for his son Chad Stephen Alcombrack who was then 7 years old and the beneficiary of his grandfather's life insurance policy. The insurance company issued a check for $30,588.39 made payable to "Charles Alcombrack, Guardian of the Estate of Chad…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Trenton Trust Co. v. Western Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  3. Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
  4. Anhold v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Von Gohren v. Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kieburtz & Associates, Inc. v. RehnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. TJ Landco, LLC v. Harley C. Douglass, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Richards v. Seattle Metropolitan Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Estate of Freitag v. Frontier BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API