Caskie v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Maxey,
The plaintiff, a member of the bars of the States of Pennsylvania and New York, brought an action in assumpsit against the Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company (hereafter called the P. R. T.) to recover $40,000 paid to that company by the International Railway Company of Buffalo, N. Y. (hereafter called the Buffalo Company). The action is not based on privity of contract, but is for money had and received by the P. R. T. by alleged fraud. The amended statement sets forth that the plaintiff had a contract of employment with the P. R. T. from 1919 to 1930, and that for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Erdman v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Van Horn v. Van HornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
- Caskie v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- KDH Electronic Systems, Inc. v. Curtis Technology Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Loughrey v. LandonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Dubois v. U.S. Fid. Guar. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.