Loughrey v. Landon
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GORBEY, District Judge.
Defendants have filed two motions. The first is to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, R. 12(b), and the second- is to strike -the averments of paragraphs 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, R. 12 (f). In response to these motions, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. As a result of this amended complaint, defendants have withdrawn their objections as to jurisdiction and service apparently conceding that jurisdiction is founded upon diversity of citizenship and that proper service has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Klauder v. CregarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Auld v. Mobay Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- McCully-Smith Associates, Inc. v. Armour & CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Cooper v. Fidelity-Phila. Trust Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Wilkerson v. CarloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Estate of Jephson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
- Dupree v. Hertz Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Evans v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.