Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The only part of the decree which calls for comment is the award of damages.
The complaint discloses two distinct causes of action, one in equity and the other at law, and the suit is, in effect, two sepa^ rate actions tried together. Upon the first cause of action equitable relief is sought consisting of specific performance, injunction and an accounting for profits. Upon the second, damages are claimed.
The only items of damage claimed by the plaintiff are the counsel fee and expenses necessarily incurred by the plaintiff in obtaining the equitable relief which he…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barnett v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
- Feldmesser v. LembergerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
- Ramondo Et Ux. v. Pure Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Eddyside Co. v. SeibelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Caskie v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mid-Continent Telephone Corp. v. Home Telephone Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1970
- Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Meyering v. RussellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- McDonald v. McGowanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Peoples Mortgage Co. v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.