Legal Opinion

Hyde v. Wages

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1984No. 83-163PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred to reversal by allowing plaintiff to introduce into evidence plaintiff's Exhibit No. 11, and accompanying testimony, concerning modifications and safety procedures made by the defendant following plaintiff/employee's injury, and plaintiff's Exhibit No. 16, and testimony concerning the exhibit, which dealt with accidents at other companies which occurred after the date of the accident made the basis of this action. Because we conclude that the trial court erred by admitting Exhibit No. 11 and Exhibit No. 16, we reverse and remand…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Burnwell Coal Co. v. SetzerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Karr v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  4. Going v. Alabama Steel & Wire Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Banner Welders, Inc. v. KnightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern R. Co. v. WhittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. MacOn County Com'n v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Slade v. City of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  4. Kmart Corp. v. PeakSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. Phar-Mor, Inc. v. GoffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API