Legal Opinion

Phar-Mor, Inc. v. Goff

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 14, 1992No. 1900979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phar-Mor, Inc., the defendant in this negligence action, appeals, contending that the trial court erred in admitting photographs taken at the time of the trial that Phar-Mor says showed subsequent remedial measures.

This action arose out of an accident that occurred at a Mobile Phar-Mor store. Mrs. Edna Goff allegedly fell when her foot was caught under a display basket in the store. She alleges that Phar-Mor negligently or wantonly maintained the aisles of the store in an unreasonably dangerous condition, negligently or wantonly failed to maintain the aisles in a reasonably safe condition,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MacOn County Com'n v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Banner Welders, Inc. v. KnightonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. Robert PROBUS and Geneva Probus, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. K-MART, INC., and Keller Industries, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. Norwood Clinic, Inc. v. SpannSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Russellville Flower Craft v. SearcySupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tuer v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Boyd v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Evans v. Fruehauf Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. City of Dothan v. SegoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  5. Precise Engineering Inc. v. LaCombeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API