Legal Opinion
School District No. One of Pima County v. Lohr
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 28, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1129PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
A summary judgment in favor of the ap-pellee (defendant below) is the subject of this appeal. The appellants (plaintiffs below) filed suit alleging in substance that the Board of Trustees of School District No. One had employed the law firm of Aboud & Aboud as legal counsel for School District No. One “for any and all legal and lawful purposes”, that the plaintiffs had duly authorized payment of $2,000 to said attorneys for “general legal counsel fees and legal services”, and that the defendant refused to honor the payment of such fee. The defendant’s pleading admitted such…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arizona State Land Department v. McFateArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Jaynes v. StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- School Dist. No. 69 of Maricopa County v. AltherrCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Pima County v. GrossettaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Ward v. San Diego School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Godbey v. ROOSEVELT SCH. DIST. NO. 66, ETC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Kaman Aerospace Corp. v. Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Arizona Department of Administration v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Board of Supervisors v. WoodallCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Arizona Department of Adminstration v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.