Legal Opinion
Pima County v. Grossetta
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1939No. Civil No. 4128PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— This is an action by Warren A. Grossetta, R. H. Martin and J. B. Mead, hereinafter called plaintiffs, against Pima County, a political subdivision of the state of Arizona, Elliott Dunseath, Herbert F. Krucker, Archie R. Conner, Gerald Jones, Clarence Houston and V. Clare Dodd, well-known members of the bar of the state, and J. Mercer Johnson in three capacities, individually, as county attor ney-elect of Pima County, and as representative of the taxpayers of Pima County, hereinafter called defendants, with the state of Arizona intervening through Joe Conway, its attorney general.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Phoenix v. KiddArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- American-La France & Foamite Corp. v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- State of Arizona v. GriffithArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Town of Tempe v. CorbellArizona Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Riley v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Mariano & Assoc., PC v. Board of County Com'rs of Sublette CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Cannizzo v. Berwyn Township 708 Community Mental Health BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Duggan v. City of TauntonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Mammoth Cave Production Credit Ass'n v. GrossCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.