Legal Opinion

Arizona Department of Administration v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 17, 2009No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0198PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 This ease arises from appellant/plaintiff Arizona Department of Administration’s (ADOA) claim that it was entitled to recover the cost of medical care that it provided to appellees/defendants Jennifer and Richard Cox through the state health insurance plan. ADOA appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of ADOA, but awarding it a much lower amount than it had claimed. In their cross-appeal, the Coxes contend ADOA is not entitled to reimbursement. We affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of ADOA, but vacate the amount awarded…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang WangCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API