Arizona Department of Administration v. Cox
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 This ease arises from appellant/plaintiff Arizona Department of Administration’s (ADOA) claim that it was entitled to recover the cost of medical care that it provided to appellees/defendants Jennifer and Richard Cox through the state health insurance plan. ADOA appeals the trial court’s decision granting summary judgment in favor of ADOA, but awarding it a much lower amount than it had claimed. In their cross-appeal, the Coxes contend ADOA is not entitled to reimbursement. We affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of ADOA, but vacate the amount awarded…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Arkansas Department of Health & Human Services v. AhlbornSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Larson v. FarleyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Grosvenor Holdings, L.C. v. FigueroaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Assyia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State ex rel. Raber v. Hongliang WangCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Grosvenor Holdings v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009