Legal Opinion

La Republique Francaise v. Saratoga Vichy Springs Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 9, 1901No. 29PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court for the Northern district of New York, which dismissed the complainants’ bill in equity to restrain the use of the word “Vichy” upon the defendant’s bottles containing the water of the spring known as the “Saratoga Vichy Spring,” and for other relief, upon the ground that the defendant’s labels and advertisements improperly and unfairly misled purchasers to believe that they were buying the complainants’ article, and unfairly interfered with their exclusive right to the use of the word “Vichy.” 99 Fed. 733. The facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co. v. EagleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  4. La Republique Francaise v. SchultzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  5. La Republique Francaise v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1900

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. LehmanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  3. Draper v. SkerrettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
  4. Sterling Remedy Co. v. Spermine Medical Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  5. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co. v. Saratoga Carlsbad Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API