Legal Opinion
Saratoga Vichy Spring Co. v. Saratoga Carlsbad Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONGER, District Judge.
This is an action for trade mark infringement and for unfair competition. The plaintiff is a New York corporation having been organized in 1876 and having been actively engaged in business ever since. The defendant Saratoga Carlsbad Corporation is a New York corporation having been organized in 1939. The defendant Carafano was and is the President of the defendant corporation.
During the trial I dismissed the complaint as to the defendant Young because he actually severed his connection with the defendant corporation in July, 1940.
Both corporate parties are engaged' in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Menendez v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Thaddeus Davids Co. v. Davids Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- French Republic v. Saratoga Vichy Spring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Nashville Syrup Co. v. Coca Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Bowmar Instrument Corp. v. Continental Microsystems, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. H. Rosenthal Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1965
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. LehmanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1979
- Saratoga Vichy Spring Co., Inc. v. Orin Lehman, Commissioner of Parks and Recreation of the the State of New York and Waters of Saratoga Springs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.